What's Happened To Jo Guest

visit

quite a long time now I have not written. This was .. Anyway - do not want to talk about it. Recently I experienced visits the elder of my church. He informed my parents who were at the meeting - that the "visit" me the next day. Excuse me - but I have somewhere to visit, which otherwise might be called "napraszaniem up." Some may say that the picking, but at this point, another term which can be called such behavior can not see. Anyway - came hours before a study book. He immediately struck me with his person. Started a "soft" talk - as does most of the "older". Themes from "what you hear," What are you doing recently, "like work" and ending on "when I see you at the meeting." I could not stand, I started asking questions. First - if Jehovah - as we read in the Bible - has created between himself and the people as a messenger, and only Jesus - what he does on the very top of organizations' governing body - which represents "the visible channel of communication"? Furthermore - why, since Jehovah is God, hence - the essence of perfect, and assuming that in fact this "communication channel" is his work - often mistaken, often completely changing the existing "law"? After all, perfection God also shows his infallibility, and thus - apparently this "communication channel" is not directed by Jehovah. After a few such questions, and answers that did not bring enough satisfaction to me - talking about "new light" s chief said that apparently started to read the apostates, and thus was faster than he came, leaving the jacket. Strange behavior for a person like that should help us understand the depth of truth "biblical" and clarify any doubts. At the end of this relationship I would go back briefly to the theme of "new light" dawanego us by the Governing Body. In my understanding - please forgive my weakness - a new light, it means a new understanding. If I see the item - say it is black and white and round. New light in this case would mean that looking at the same object to say that this ball. Looking through the prism of that old words - "new light" given to members of the organization would - when looking for the same item - a statement that it is no longer a black and white and a red, round and square. I hope that once the essence of "better understanding" I will know in depth.

How Can I Use Bmxcolor

know. I ask many questions. I guess it is better to think and reflect on what is going on rather than blindly follow the crowd, so you really do not know which way .. Some of the Jehovah's Witnesses can I complain apostate practice, but understand - I do not have to denigrate the Watchtower Society. I note only my private thoughts and observations about the functioning of the churches, the behavior of the brothers and the content of publications. Before you judge me so - try to read all the notes and consider whether there is that something that he wanted to tell and just scared. You do not have what? Would certainly?

Returning to the topic .. I wanted to write about the vocabulary - quite specific and hard to understand for people from "outside" organizations. What I especially do not like - contemptuous attitude towards those who are not Jehovah's Witnesses. Not true? This is where you referring to this type of determination and światus Philistine? After all, according to Psalm 145:21 Jehovah's fame should be proclaimed, which, as we read in James 5:11 is God in the affectionate feelings and merciful. Where that mercy and tenderness to the potential future sheep? Another Formulation of whom wanted to write a bad system things. It has a reference to the current political situation and the material around. The fact that the end of this system of things is just right repeats itself every Jehovah's Witness from the beginning to the end of life (sic). Sometimes - even in earlier years - could be heard at meetings and meetings calling for hard work in the work of the Lord, and consider the sense of gaining a higher education. It is interesting that, as an alternative to higher education and well-paid job was administered pełnoczasową pioneering service, which allows outside meetings, meetings, personal study and preparation, and finally, the same service - a "pioneer" has no time for anything else. In addition - being the person who completed their education in high school - not always with the final exams - in fact, in addition to hard, physical labor is not possible to find any source of income. Anyway - about the history of mankind is easy to see that the poorly educated people are easier to direct. All the more so if their main occupation is preaching the word - they can sometimes convince themselves of what they want. False? I worked as a sales representative. Despite the fact that the offer of the company where I was on-time was not impressive, and the technical facilities was limited to an absolute minimum - I knew that in order to convince the customer to do anything, you first have to believe it himself. Faith came in as the next of subsequent offers to customers. This is the same - at least in my opinion - is a pioneering service in the event. Time to broadcast the good news . Speech is of course of the pending case in the Bible, when God heal all diseases, removes death, etc (more in Revelation [Revelation] 21:4). Highlights in this wonderful good news that that the merciful God will destroy all non-Jehovah's Witnesses, regardless of their deeds. A little weird. theocratic agenda - Formulation of a series of further interest. This time refers to the hierarchy prevailing in the churches, "Christian". So the top is God, Jesus, executive body (also called the remnant), the Office of branches, offices of these Committees, Supervisors people, elders, servants, and at the end of the auxiliary preachers. Everything beautiful and pretty - it's an organization of God and is to be in order. But is that surely? But as sole mediator between them and the people God has established Jesus Christ. So can anyone explain to me why the hell the word as the sole executive body has the ability to interpret correct advice, the principles and teachings given to us in the Bible, even though he had repeatedly shown that he is fallible? If so rigidly to adhere to the commandments of God, why have added a "middleman" between us and God? Next question .. Why, if one is a Jehovah's Witness and meet him some problems in life - this is called "persecution for their faith," and when away from the religion and the problems are the same - the name is changed to "no blessings"? This reminds me of my friend's words about a positive attitude. In fact - if it is positively oriented - even thinking, "God is with me, bless me" - when you run out of these problems - that "faith" but rather the conviction will be much stronger, although the intervention of God toto had little in common. Another thing - what "not to engage in power?" From the observations made during the return from meetings - whether by bus or car, often coming down to talk politics after mindless skrytykowaniu all the power (not paying attention to what she did good) go down to the hopes of taking power through Christ. Well. Jesus will rule the world, but until that happens we are still alive. Right? Recent hard Formulation of the day: pioneering center. What is it? Departure - mostly in rural areas, in order to help churches from the region, which, considering the enormous variation and a small number of members does not give advice to develop this area. Memories of the pioneering center are the most bruising after falls from the bicycle, sunburn acquired "off duty", zealous preaching of "natives", shared evenings - often combined with songs (but only to 22 (sic)) by the fire. And all for what? In most cases, young people are leaving the centers just to drown his conscience, to show others what they are true (I know the "pioneers" who could be the season at 4-5 centers) and also to establish closer contacts with the opposite sex and drink a beer. The next thing is to go back home and coming up with "building" experiences. Excuse a little bit sorry for hugs.

Gold Baby Desert Eagle Bb Gun

asked more questions before bedtime.

Why, when the Organization there is such unity of thought, the eyebrow appeals Watchtower "brothers" create web pages, feeds on a variety of chat rooms and even a group on the site grono.net? But already in 1999 in the service of the Kingdom has been clearly stated:

worth noting that many people created websites on the internet - supposedly in order to proclaim the good news. These include the many misguided brothers . Others may assume apostates who would deceive anything niepodejrzewające unit (2 John 9-11). In our Service Kingdom in November 1997, explained to a third party, whether to create such a page: " There is no need to have someone prepare their own materials on the activities or beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses, and he published them online. in our official website [www.watchtower.org] legitimate messages are accessible to everyone. "

addition - any kind of participation in newsgroups, on internet forums of expression was to be allowed - as we read in Awake! No. 1 of January 8, 1998, p.12

"We must realize that many web pages created in immoral or fraudulent intent. There is also plenty of other places on the internet which, while not required to serve such a purpose, but they are robbing of the time - this, for example, newsgroups. From all these traps stay away! "

So if truth should make us free and happy, then why every move this" freedom "is limited - whether in the case of discussion forums whether the conversations in chat rooms? Why we can not have their own will? I remember today - 6 years ago when I started hanging out in chat rooms, one directly mentioned it in conversation to the young "brother" from the congregation. Of course - it scared the apostates and degeneratami what I have submitted the case to contact the elderly. Of course - an interview in the "peace revelations" about the dangers of this type of talk (sic), not sure about the "other side" and - surprisingly - questioning the content of such discussions. Exactly. Case meddlesome nature of most co-religionists. Another thing. never had a girl in the truth - maybe because I strangely feel going from this to the "meeting" at the same time knowing that this, this and this before her were. It's like being a friend of the ex-girlfriend. Returning to the theme. Whenever you seen me somewhere in town with my darling - ended up draining it on a friend of sight, leading later to the familiar "peace confidences." There would be no surprise if it was not even a question zakrawające "dish in the face." Hour lecture on the immorality spotykaniu of "persons of the opposite sex from the world, temptations, and really about everything and nothing. Later tradition - have was certainly right, even if that reason did not have - for this reason that, if not, you made - by the parents were told. And then - again, like a lecture course - just that a few (days / month). As a result - always went to the sitter. On the other hand - if so great morality, characterized by "Christian youth" is where you declare a "sister" I once met at a meeting with District At most centers, is always going on in the tents. I remember - we grałyśmy at cards and lost the next virtue, A. . Forgive me, dear brothers and sisters - But with its own "central" experience I know that going out at night "walks", sleeping youth in the various tents (where most who die - if beer or other liquors is too much) - belongs to everyday life. So I pretend to be holy hell?

Sore Gum Throat And Jaw

rotfl: elite weddings.

Excuse me - but such a "starring" at weddings Jehovah's Witnesses have not yet seen.

Address: == tu-find-link =

Forgive me, but I think this is embarrassing, so appealing to religious motives, and willingness to remain "pure" in God's eyes go round interest, in addition, using the name of Jehovah. Maybe another bridal salon - the signboards in the style of "Jehovah's Witnesses" and "clothes line with the recommendations Bible." At this point, of course, a few Bible verses and articles from the guards.

How To Make Yam Tempura Roll

like to go?

Many voices can be heard that Jehovah's Witnesses are a sect usidlająca people. Is this true? Reflecting on this, one might conclude that the point of view depends on the point of the seat. Generally speaking - no one is forbidden to meet with people outside the organization, but - after or before such meeting, the board may hear that "bad company spoils useful habits." Imagine a situation. You are in the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses for a long time. Suppose - 10-15 years. At some point you notice that something is not fit and not everything in it is as it was presented at the outset. Doubts are growing, as far as studying the issue and present at meetings or gatherings. At some point you want to share With these concerns with someone close. Looking around you notice that the people closest to you are "brothers" because, in fact by those 10-15 years utrzymywaliście no more contacts with people from "outside", living in the belief that persons who are not Jehovah's Witnesses are not good company for you. But when you have enough life in hypocrisy and a lie (not saying that Jehovah's Witnesses and are lying hypocrites, but most people that I know of a "minister" at various positions in churches belong to that group) formed a kind of lock. What? After the demise of the "organization" is completely alone. You have no friends. In contact with Jehovah's Witnesses do not have anything count - you have been excluded, and therefore a fool expensed sms or phone call you can forget. Meeting you on the street, they will treat you like air. Thinking over the deeper it is clear that the maintenance of a proposal in this organization - in addition to promises of "eternal life in paradise on earth" and the fear of death at Armageddon, comes down to psychosis derives from fear of rejection by friends or friends of many years.

Sample Church Welcome Vistors Speech

watchtower on 1 July 2006, page 1926-1930

From time to time I hope to publish my thoughts on current articles to the study of the guards, or read other publications of the Watchtower Society. Starting as far as the actual magazine - as the title notes.

first doubt - already in the first paragraph - quoted Tertullian's "Let [children] become Christians, they are able to know Christ." This begs me to question - whether such a 1912-1916 year old child receiving baptism, and not really having a clue about what's going on around him is able to know Christ? In retrospect, looking at the behavior of his and other - at that age I know that this required (apparently) still a lot of mental maturity, they are missing.

second question - how can you read in third paragraph, "The Bible indicates that young children " are holy " in God's eyes, even when a Christian is only one parent." Sorry - can not understand something - but what about the sanctity in the eyes of such a wonderful and loving God Jehovah is what is the origin of such a child? But in the first paragraph (see above) talked about raising a person "to know Christ" - and thus - if such a child if his parents are not "Christian" (in the context of being a Jehovah's Witness, of course) in God's sight is not worth living?

third question - a little further in the third paragraph reads: "Of course children wchowywane by godly parents receive training so that over time, may voluntarily provide that also dedicate themselves to Jehovah." Small question - How many of you know young people who raised a family of Jehovah's Witnesses have not adopted the baptism? This is not about people who are baptized and then went away from this very "beautiful" (pff..) Organization.

fourth question - the sixth paragraph speaks of the criticism against "Christian parents" and how to educate their children. "Can someone criticize the parents that instill their children what they think is right and morally beneficial? No criticism of the atheists, for example, who teach their children that God does not exist. Catholics feel obliged to raise their children in the Catholic faith and they are not criticized for it. Just so no one should accuse Jehovah's Witnesses, that manipulate the minds of their children when they are trying to communicate basic truths and moral principles given by Jehovah. " So turn - What can be defined as "essential truth"? To tell the truth - in the baby's head is forced into such a quantity of information possessed by each elderly person in the congregation. In fact - children are not forced to do anything. At least this is not the official name of the function called "encouraging." Thus, "encouraged" to proclaim we are, reading, listening, smile, etc. but where is the encouragement to talk about what everyone really thinks of us? Next - why do immediately "without breaking" is given the main argument manipulate the minds of children ? How else could you describe to inculcate "the only right and true faith "to children from an early age, the assertion that everything outside the" Jehovah's organization "is wrong, call the" other " światusami and forbid the participation in public life - even silly fun and discos - under the guise of protecting against immorality, drugs, etc. . After all, if your child will want it sooner or later, and so something łyknie / burn. There must be a disco or school trip. With reference to the seventh paragraph, which posed the question: "What if the child objects to education as parents, as peer pressure is and wants act as they do? "I wanted to ask - why was mentioned only peer pressure? Why do most shit babra where the" Christian "youth is due to" peer pressure "? And what if these young people made a conscious decision and can now decide themselves what they think is right and wrong? If you do not want to go to meetings, I want to occasionally go out for a disco or a party that is to say that "the world absorbs me 'or' peers have a bad effect on me?"

fifth question - the eighth paragraph, last sentence of Timothy, his mother and grandmother: "Later, when they were chrześcijankami, that young man did not impose religious views, but argued it reasonable explanations based on God's Word, so you believed." Think logically - if he lived with his mother and grandmother, and they argued it so - Timothy poor had no choice - he had believed. You know what it is brainwashing? No? [click]

Sixth doubt - Paragraph ninth. The first sentence: "Jehovah created humans could so that it resembles a work - programmed to fulfill his will, unable to make another choice." None of you - talk with Jehovah's Witnesses never had the impression that whoever talked not - everyone says the same thing? "Older" argue that it is a "unanimity of the people of God" - but as for me, more of a carved, imprinted current rule that people hang on to hold.

So much of my doubts about the current "study of the guards."
that I would submit this blog is not carried out against Jehovah's Witnesses, and as a record of personal reflection on the teachings and behavior - I hope - conducted sound eye.

Buying Model Helicopter In Mumbai

childhood

From an early age I was taken away to the meetings of Jehovah's Witnesses. Sometimes, also participated in the "service". My company mostly confined to "zborowych" colleagues. However, even when they had to watch out for each spoken word - because everything that they did not like it - trafiało to their parents, and from them back to mine. It reminds me now situations described in the "Diary of the Red Army officer - even when parents are afraid donoszących the children. It was strange for me is that Jehovah's organization, described as "liberating" and "cleansing" before talking about what I thought stop me, not so much his own conscience - and so already "trained on the basis of the Bible" and the fear of becoming ill and another zinterpretowanym "conversation" - just really different from the hearing.

What else did not like me "in his youth?
became the first place is always false and deceiving. Obviously - for a child everything is either true or false. Were unknown to me then "games" adults, so I was often torn between what you just heard and what I saw later.
additional aversion to the "truth" filled me with those famous "new light". I never liked people changing your mind. If something was to be such and not the other is why suddenly been changed? The more that God has taught me how - is infallible, and thus - already pulled out such a request - it's clearly not the light comes from God.

At the age of probably - I do not remember exactly - I was twelve years nieochrzczonym preacher. Why? It is said that "you did it for myself" or "the love of Jehovah," but you know .. really - that religious consciousness has a 12 year old boy? From what I remember - I did it because I had enough questions and conversations that begin with "how old are you?", Leading the "you are already a preacher?" and ending "and when would you like to be?". But really - what kind of knowledge that could be used in true evangelism - has a 12 year old child? Is it possible to hold talks with him about the situation in the world? Wie Finally there are wars and famine, but does not know the reasons, does not know what, how and why. "Producing" heralds of an age to me is proof of an attempt to addiction from an early age such person from the "organization" and "brothers." Anyway - an approaching period dojżewania and changes in thinking and conclusions reached - could it really be a threat to the continued existence of such a person in the congregation. As a result - there would be a risk of sharing their thoughts among the other brothers. Maybe that's why the "older" at least twice a month going out with me for service? I remember that during this "service" has repeatedly asked me about the situation at home, with my thoughts and conclusions, and when from time to time I said what I did not really fit, and what I want to change - after a few days after the meeting I was led to "peace confessions "(as he later called a small room in which the" elders "held talks with the" sheep ".

Primarygames/dunebuggy.com

the beginning of history, also called an introduction

During further reading, many of you may wonder who I am. I have a little more than twenty years. From the age of eight, probably I was raised in a family of Jehovah's Witnesses. Since I can remember anyone else around - and I had the company only "the truth''did not like what I did. Is it my hair - always wore short hair, or clothing - baggy pants, and speech - the language spoken casually, not learned and not" rigid ". I hated the deception reigning among the most "brothers" and "sisters." I always came into the meeting and was greeted with joy - I knew I had fallen down behind the comments about my behavior. The worst thing was that whenever I tried to tell the people to which it seemed to me that I trust - was practiced a kind of informer - Whether the parents or the "older" or "servants auxiliary." This resulted in many conversations - until the completion of those magical 18 years - with the participation of parents. I've always been perceived as a Two faced. Why? In truth I have no idea. I always did what I wanted. Never with that did not hide. I said what about someone or something I thought - simply and bluntly. Maybe because most of the "brothers" from me pushed, seeing me, literally as an apostate? Maybe. I know one thing. Jehovah's Witnesses, despite a really lofty goals and objectives - still far from the planned perfection. This is what I have seen for several years - so I'm going to describe to finally see the light of day. The end of silence and questions "within the organization," where nothing really happened with that never does.